Justice · Supreme Court, 11th Judicial District
Independent public-information platform. Not affiliated with the New York State Unified Court System.
Ratings and reviews reflect individual user experiences and are not findings of judicial misconduct, attorney misconduct, illegality, bias, corruption, or professional discipline. Official findings are displayed separately and linked to their authoritative source.
Public experience
Derived only from verified reviewer feedback, with the full formula published. This is not an official measure of performance.
Public experience
INSUFFICIENT VERIFIED FEEDBACK
0 verified reviews · 0 unique cases · 0 total submissions
Rating confidence
Insufficient
Early feedback — insufficient sample for a reliable public score (0 of 5 verified reviews).
No category ratings from verified reviewers yet
Trend
By case type
No case-type breakdown yet.
Separation of evidence
Public feedback, document-supported claims and official findings are counted separately and never merged into a single accusation number.
Claim ledger — never combined
Authoritative record
Only determinations by a court, appellate panel, grievance committee, judicial-conduct commission or comparable authority appear here.
New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct public determination (1979): Censure.
Outcome: Censure
Public Determinations of the NYS Commission on Judicial Conduct — data.ny.govContinuously monitored public record
Found automatically by name in public appellate, federal and disciplinary records and refreshed on a schedule. Documents are grouped into distinct cases by docket number. These are research leads, matched by name only — confirm each document before treating it as this person's case.
Limtung v. Thomas
Limtung v. Thomas
CourtListener RECAP — federal docketsLimtung v. Thomas
CourtListener RECAP — federal docketsLimtung v. Steven J. Baum, P.C.
Limtung v. Steven J. Baum, P.C.
CourtListener RECAP — federal docketsLimtung v. Steven J. Baum, P.C.
CourtListener RECAP — federal docketsIn re Hall
In re Hall
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. By decision and order of this Court dated July 24, 2001, the respondent was suspended from the practice of law pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.4 (Z) (1) (ii) and (iii) pending further order of the Court upon a finding that he was guilty of professional misconduct immediately threatening the p”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsIn re Hall
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. By decision and order of this Court dated July 24, 2001, the respondent was suspended from the practice of law pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.4 (Z) (1) (ii) and (iii) pending further order of the Court upon a finding that he was guilty of professional misconduct immediately threatening the p”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsMillennium Aviation Services, Inc. v. General Dynamics Co
Millennium Aviation Services, Inc. v. General Dynamics Co
CourtListener RECAP — federal docketsMillennium Aviation Services, Inc. v. General Dynamics Co
CourtListener RECAP — federal docketsCity of New York v. Andrews
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Arthur W. Lonschein, J. In this case the Police Department of the City of New York seeks extraordinary injunctive relief, of a nature unprecedented in New York, to control a street prostitution business. The chief component of this relief is the exclusion of certain individuals from the Queens Pla”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsLittle v. City of New York
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Arthur W. Lonschein, J. The plaintiff alleges that she was injured in a motor vehicle accident with a taxi owned by the defendant Song Cab Corporation (Song Cab) and driven by the defendant Puello, occasioned at least in part by a malfunctioning traffic light. The movant Welsbach Electric Corporat”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsCity of New York v. Warehouse on the Block, Ltd.
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Arthur W. Lonschein, J. This is a motion for a preliminary injunction and temporary *490closing order pursuant to the Nuisance Abatement Law (Administrative Code of City of NY § 7-701 et seq.). It is claimed that the defendant is an adult bookstore operating in a Cl-2 overlay within a RZ-1 Zoning ”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsCity of New York v. Loveshack Video
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Arthur W. Lonschein, J. *696In this action, the City of New York seeks a permanent injunction pursuant to the Nuisance Abatement Law (Administrative Code of City of NY § 7-701 et seq.) on the grounds that the defendant is operating as an adult establishment in violation of section 42-01 of the Zon”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsAbitol v. Schiff
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Arthur W. Lonschein, J. In 1996, CPLR 3211 (e) was amended so that a defendant *950who has served an answer asserting an objection of improper service of the summons and complaint is held to have waived the objection unless he moves for judgment on that ground within 60 days of serving the pleadin”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsCity of New York v. J & J Tummy Yummies Inc.
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Arthur W. Lonschein, J. The plaintiff City has moved for a preliminary injunction in *528this action to enjoin the defendants from operating an establishment doing business as the “Naked City”. It is claimed that the “Naked City” is an adult eating or drinking establishment doing business in viola”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsCity of New York v. 114-25 Farmers Boulevard
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Arthur W. Lonschein, J. This action for a permanent injunction was brought to enjoin an alleged public nuisance being conducted in a grocery store located at 114-25 Farmers Boulevard, Jamaica, New York. On June 15, 1998, this court issued a temporary restraining order, temporary closing order, and”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsGiant Used Cars A/S, Inc. v. Baptiste
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Arthur W. Lonschein, J. This motion for an order vacating an arbitration award and petition is dismissed. The alternate arbitration mechanism set forth in section 198-b of the General Business Law and the *1014regulations promulgated thereunder, 13 NYCRR part 300, establish a compulsory arbitratio”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsTepper v. Lonschein
“ Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition, in effect, inter alia, to prohibit the respondent Arthur Lonschein, a Justice of the Supreme Court, from enforcing against the *436petitioner a temporary restraining order contained in an order to show cause signed by the respondent Justice on Decemb”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsValdez v. Cibulski
Valdez v. Cibulski
“ —In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., nonparties Kenneth L. Brown and Rivkin, Radler & Kremer appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lonschein, J.), dated December 17, 1996, which imposed a $10,000 sanction upon them. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbu”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsValdez v. Cibulski
“ —In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., nonparties Kenneth L. Brown and Rivkin, Radler & Kremer appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lonschein, J.), dated December 17, 1996, which imposed a $10,000 sanction upon them. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbu”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsCivic Ass'n of Utopia Estates, Inc. v. City of New York
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Arthur W. Lonschein, J. This proceeding concerns a sewer project known as the Surrey Place Sewer Project (the Project) pursuant to which the respondents intend to rip up a section of 179th Street. The intention is to replace the existing sewer lines with sewer lines of greater capacity, in order t”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsCity of New York v. 56-01 Queens Boulevard, Inc.
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Arthur W. Lonschein, J. *643This is a motion for a preliminary injunction, pursuant to Administrative Code of the City of New York § 7-701 et seq., known as the Nuisance Abatement Law. By this motion, the plaintiff City seeks an order closing a commercial establishment known as the "Naked City”, o”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsA.J. Temple Marble & Tile, Inc. v. Long Island Rail Road
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Arthur W. Lonschein, J. The defendant’s motion is determined as follows: *423The plaintiff, A.J. Temple Marble & Tile, Inc. (Temple), and the defendant, the Long Island Rail Road (LIRR), a public benefits corporation owned by the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, entered into a contract on Oc”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsGreco v. Supp
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Arthur W. Lonschein, J. This is a petition for the disclosure of certain information and documents, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law (Public Officers Law art 6). The respondent cross-moves to dismiss. A number of parcels of real property in Far Rockaway were taken by the respondent pursu”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsGish v. Allstate Insurance
“ *295OPINION OF THE COURT Arthur W. Lonschein, J. The plaintiff moves for summary judgment in this action pursuant to Insurance Law § 3420 (a) (2). Plaintiff seeks payment from defendant Allstate Insurance Company (hereinafter Allstate) of the unpaid portion of a judgment entered in plaintiffs favor in another action i”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsValdez v. Cibulski
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Arthur W. Lonschein, J. Rule 130-1.1 of the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the *50Courts (22 NYCRR 130-1.1) permits the imposition of sanctions because of frivolous conduct indulged in by attorneys in civil litigation. The rule defines a lawyer’s conduct as frivolous if he or she takes a posi”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsBarracca v. St. Francis Hospital
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Arthur W. Lonschein, J. Following the selection of a jury in this medical malpractice-wrongful death action, the court ordered that the trial proceed in a bifurcated manner, that is, the liability issues to be tried first, and if the jury finds liability against any or all of the three defendants,”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsChristopher v. Gurrieri
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Arthur W. Lonschein, J. Plaintiff, the holder of a promissory note made by the defendants, has brought this action for collection thereof when the defendants failed and refused to make the required payments thereunder. The promissory note was given to secure payment of the balance owed pursuant to”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsHon v. Tsui-Ping Hon
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Arthur W. Lonschein, J. In this New York matrimonial action, the defendant seeks to enjoin the plaintiff from prosecuting a separate matrimonial action that he has commenced in the State of Connecticut. This action was commenced by the plaintiff husband in 1991. Since then, the parties have entere”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsTimal v. Kiamzon
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Arthur W. Lonschein, J. This motion brings into question the right of the defendants’ insurer, Group Council Mutual Insurance Company (Group Council), to issue an undertaking to stay the execution of a $700,000 medical malpractice judgment on appeal. The defendants include LaGuardia Medical Group,”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsAltman v. Gassman
Altman v. Gassman
“ —Judgment, Supreme Court, Queens County (Arthur W. Lonschein, J.), entered on or about March 17, 1992, which, after jury trial, found in favor of the defendant, and dismissed the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs. As there is no evidence of a "loss of use” of plaintiff’s back within the meaning of Insuran”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsAltman v. Gassman
“ —Judgment, Supreme Court, Queens County (Arthur W. Lonschein, J.), entered on or about March 17, 1992, which, after jury trial, found in favor of the defendant, and dismissed the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs. As there is no evidence of a "loss of use” of plaintiff’s back within the meaning of Insuran”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsSpremo v. Lonschein
Spremo v. Lonschein
“ Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the issues presented have become moot. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic. ”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsSpremo v. Lonschein
“ Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the issues presented have become moot. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic. ”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsTaines v. Gene Barry One Hour Photo Process
“ Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Arthur Lonschein, J.), entered on or about January 24, 1984, affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Concur — Sandler, Sullivan and Ross, JJ. ”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsIn re Lonschein
In re Lonschein
“ *571OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. Petitioner, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Eleventh Judicial District, seeks review pursuant to subdivision 7 of section 44 of the Judiciary Law of a determination that he be censured for certain actions undertaken while a Judge of the Civil Court of the City of New York. The de”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsIn re Lonschein
“ *571OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. Petitioner, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Eleventh Judicial District, seeks review pursuant to subdivision 7 of section 44 of the Judiciary Law of a determination that he be censured for certain actions undertaken while a Judge of the Civil Court of the City of New York. The de”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsPeople v. Klein
People v. Klein
“ no opinion. Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson. ”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsPeople v. Klein
“ no opinion. Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson. ”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsLinakis v. Larkin
Linakis v. Larkin
“ no opinion. ”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsLinakis v. Larkin
“ no opinion. ”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsPublic web mentions
Negative results found on the public web by automated search. These are unverified mentions from third-party sites — not official records, not allegations by this directory, and not findings of fact. Each entry links to the original page so you can read it in context.
Devine v. Lonschein, 621 F. Supp. 894 (S.D.N.Y. 1985) - Justia Law
“Defendant Arthur W. Lonschein is a Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, with chambers in Jamaica, New York. Defendant Robert J. Sise is ...”
Read at law.justia.com →[PDF] courts of the state of new york
“... Arthur W. Lonschein (12). Robert J. McDonald. John A. Milano (12). Vincent F ... abuse of discretion. (CPLR 7803 [3].) What is reviewed under this ...”
Read at nycourts.gov →[PDF] 83110NCJRS.pdf - Office of Justice Programs
“Arthur W. Lonschein is a justice ,of" the Supreme Court,. Eleventh ... censure and removed the judge f.rom office. The Court concluded. ,that the as ...”
Read at ojp.gov →United States v. Goldstein, 342 F. Supp. 661 (E.D.N.Y. 1972) :: Justia
“Arthur W. Lonschein, Jamaica, N. Y., for Morris Kessler. Joseph E. Brill ... due process and to his constitutional rights. Defendants Kessler and ...”
Read at law.justia.com →Submit News Article - LawyerRatingz.com
“Submit News Article. Arthur W. Lonschein Lawyer. Rego Park, NY. Practice Area: General Practice Profile updated: 3/11/13. Submit profile update. Optional: Login ...”
Read at lawyerratingz.com →Newell v. Troy, 343 F. Supp. 1253 (E.D.N.Y. 1972) - Justia Law
“Arthur W. Lonschein, Jamaica, N. Y., for defendants Troy and Watkins. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. NEAHER, District Judge. In this action for injunctive relief to ...”
Read at law.justia.com →IN THE MATTER OF HALL :: 2002 :: New York Supreme Court ...
“... Arthur W. Lonschein, as Special Referee to hear and report. The petitioner now moves to impose discipline upon the respondent upon his failure to answer the ...”
Read at law.justia.com →Judge Cleared on One of Two Counts; 'Prestige' of Office Cited (Published 1980)
“<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMirAFBVV95cUxOYjZDdU5SSFpmRnlleGp0aGZHNlRQX1VLUnRfVkFQaWVicEN2aEQyb1NFOTJ5VGlvVm55X0pzOGN5a0k4VWUxQnNjTmhjbGVCZ25BS3hlTWdNdjBVOWw3Q0ttcFpvZjZJSklrcmhmV01KcnB4cEViakk0NG4wTHk1c2piczRrZUFkQlNYTUExRklBUXhkMlNpVEtrd0swNkY2bEJCNEkycm5vbE1F?oc=5" target="_blank">Judge Cleared on One of Two Counts; 'Prestige' of Office Cited (Published 1980)</a> <font color”
Read at The New York Times →Evidence submitted on this platform
Documents and case facts submitted through the case-analysis and investigation tools and attached permanently to Justice Arthur W. Lonschein. Each entry is an allegation by the person who submitted it, published with its origin and evidence level — not a finding of fact by this directory.
No case-analysis evidence attached to this profile yet
Sign in to attach evidence from a case you analysed. A case number is required.
Court calendars
Appearance dates for this name across the New York courts, taken from published court calendars and public argument records. Anyone can read this section.
Court calendars — public listings
Calendar entries are public court listings located by name match and kept with their official source link. Court calendars change daily and names repeat — confirm every date on the court's own calendar before relying on it. A listing is not an allegation and not a finding about anyone.
Reading the published court calendars…
No future date for this name has appeared on a published calendar yet. The collector re-checks every court calendar automatically — use the official calendar search routes below in the meantime.
Appearance search (all ten courts)
Supreme and County Court civil appearances, calendars by justice, attorney and index number.
Criminal Court and County Court criminal appearance dates and parts.
Local civil courts, including NYC Civil Court appearance calendars.
Filed documents and scheduled conference dates in e-filed cases.
Court calendars & parts
Daily calendars published by the Unified Court System.
Court addresses, parts, clerks and published part rules.
Family and Surrogate's Court terms, parts and public calendar notices.
Claims against the State: calendars, decisions and judge assignments.
Appellate calendars
Arguments before the state's highest court.
AD1 argument and motion calendars.
AD2 argument and motion calendars.
AD3 argument calendars.
AD4 argument calendars.
Appellate Term calendars for the lower courts.
Recorded and scheduled oral arguments in public court records.
Court record research
Search public appellate decisions and federal dockets that name this person — judge, attorney or court clerk. Name matches are research leads, never findings.
Name-match research — not a finding
These are appeals and federal filings located by public name search. A person's name appearing in a case does not mean they were accused of anything, and names repeat — always open the docket before drawing any conclusion.
Appeals of orders
Federal filings
Comparative research
Pick a procedural pattern and compare how each Appellate Division department handled it. These are published decisions located by text search — comparisons, not findings about any person.
Best-interest findings, attorney for the child, Lincoln hearings, custody or neglect appeals.
Appellate Division, First Department
New York, Bronx
Appellate Division, Second Department
Kings, Queens, Richmond, Nassau, Suffolk, Westchester, Rockland, Orange, Putnam, Dutchess
Appellate Division, Third Department
Albany, Broome, Chemung, Clinton, Columbia, Cortland, Delaware, Essex, Franklin, Fulton, Greene, Hamilton, Madison, Montgomery, Otsego, Rensselaer, St. Lawrence, Saratoga, Schenectady, Schoharie, Schuyler, Sullivan, Tioga, Tompkins, Ulster, Warren, Washington
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Erie, Monroe, Onondaga, Oneida, Niagara, Allegany, Cattaraugus, Cayuga, Chautauqua, Genesee, Herkimer, Jefferson, Lewis, Livingston, Ontario, Orleans, Oswego, Seneca, Steuben, Wayne, Wyoming, Yates
Full public footprint — Justice Arthur W. Lonschein
Every appeal, complaint, oversight report, nonprofit filing, personal lawsuit and press mention that public sources expose for this name. Name-match only: confirm the identity in the source before treating any item as this person's record, and never treat an allegation or investigation as a finding.
Appeals & court records
Every appellate and trial record that names the person.
Complaints & discipline
Formal complaint and discipline records for judges, attorneys and court staff.
Attorney General & state oversight
AG investigations and reports, Comptroller audits, and ethics-commission filings.
Nonprofit, employment & personal matters
Board or employment separations, charity governance, and lawsuits the person is a party to.
Press & public record trail
Contemporaneous reporting, which often dates events the official record only implies.
Department territory: AD1 — 2 counties · AD2 — 10 counties · AD3 — 27 counties · AD4 — 22 counties
Docket pull & analysis
Pulls every docket and decision public court records return for this judge, then flags neutral metadata patterns: long-pending cases, appellate reversals, child-safeguard matters and civil-rights claims. Official court calendars are linked for the state cases the API does not carry.
Metadata analysis — not an adjudication
This pulls every docket and decision the public court-records API returns for this judge's name, then flags patterns from dates and captions alone: long-pending cases, appellate reversals, child and family safeguards, civil-rights claims. Flags are prompts to read the record, never conclusions about the judge.
Official court calendars
Docket search
Pattern analysis
Themes are counted by distinct cases, not by review count, and are never treated as proof of misconduct.
No recurring theme reaches the reporting threshold
Public feedback
Each review shows its own verification level. A verified reviewer is not a verified allegation.
No published feedback yet
Right to respond
Judges and attorneys may publish a response. Responses are never edited for content and are never rated.
No response published
Contribute
A verified account is required
Feedback is only accepted from a verified reviewer: sign in with Google, or register by email and confirm your address. Your identity is never shown publicly.
Sign in to give feedbackOfficial information
Official record
Court contact information is not a private communication channel
Do not use this contact information for prohibited ex parte communications or to argue a pending case directly with a judge. Court filings and case communications must follow the applicable court rules and filing procedures.
Report a judicial conduct concern
Complaints about the conduct of a New York State judge are filed with the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct. The Commission — not this directory — determines whether misconduct occurred.
Full oversight directory in Civil Watchdog →Provenance
Every directory field carries its source, tier, retrieval date and verification date. Changes are kept, not overwritten.
No source records yet
Primary source: Public Determinations of the NYS Commission on Judicial Conduct — data.ny.gov