Judge · County Court
Independent public-information platform. Not affiliated with the New York State Unified Court System.
Ratings and reviews reflect individual user experiences and are not findings of judicial misconduct, attorney misconduct, illegality, bias, corruption, or professional discipline. Official findings are displayed separately and linked to their authoritative source.
Public experience
Derived only from verified reviewer feedback, with the full formula published. This is not an official measure of performance.
Public experience
INSUFFICIENT VERIFIED FEEDBACK
0 verified reviews · 0 unique cases · 0 total submissions
Rating confidence
Insufficient
Early feedback — insufficient sample for a reliable public score (0 of 5 verified reviews).
No category ratings from verified reviewers yet
Trend
By case type
No case-type breakdown yet.
Separation of evidence
Public feedback, document-supported claims and official findings are counted separately and never merged into a single accusation number.
Claim ledger — never combined
Authoritative record
Only determinations by a court, appellate panel, grievance committee, judicial-conduct commission or comparable authority appear here.
New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct public determination (1987): Admonition.
Outcome: Admonition
Public Determinations of the NYS Commission on Judicial Conduct — data.ny.govContinuously monitored public record
Found automatically by name in public appellate, federal and disciplinary records and refreshed on a schedule. Documents are grouped into distinct cases by docket number. These are research leads, matched by name only — confirm each document before treating it as this person's case.
Lambadarios v. Kobren
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Allan L. Winick, J. Motion by defendant Myles Kobren, M.D. for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied. Cross motion by defendants Winthrop University Hospital and Salvatore LoPresti, D.O. for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as to defendant Winthrop University is denied and a”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsHoly Trinity Orthodox Church v. O'Shea
“ *881OPINION OF THE COURT Allan L. Winick, J. The petitioner, a recognized religious corporation, for the year 2000 applied for tax exemption of its real property in East Meadow, New York. As it had done in years past, it filed two applications, one under section 420-a of the Real Property Tax Law covering the church b”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsEmcor Group, Inc v. Insurance Co of NA
Emcor Group, Inc v. Insurance Co of NA
CourtListener RECAP — federal docketsEmcor Group, Inc v. Insurance Co of NA
CourtListener RECAP — federal docketsBlanco v. Elmont Union Free School District
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Allan L. Winick, J. Defendants move pursuant to CPLR 3212 for summary judgment. *919This is a personal injury action. Plaintiff, Sophie Blanco, who was almost 11 years of age at the time of the accident, was injured in the gymnasium of the Alden Terrace School, North Valley Stream, New York. She w”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsSuffolk County v. Long Island Power Authority
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Allan L. Winick, J. Petition pursuant to CPLR article 78 for a judgment annulling the respondent Long Island Power Authority’s (LIPA) determination dated August 21, 1997, which ratified the definitive agreements between it and Long Island Lighting Company (LILCO) and accepted conditions imposed by”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsMorales v. County of Nassau
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Allan L. Winick, J. *36The issue raised in this case involves the application of CPLR article 16 and its effect on the instructions to be given to the jury concerning apportionment of fault between tortfeasors, one of whom was negligent and the other an intentional tortfeasor, not a party to the l”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsFunderburke v. Uniondale Union Free School District No. 15
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Allan L. Winick, J. Motion by defendant Uniondale Union Free School District No. 15 (the school district) to dismiss the complaint is granted pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7). This action was commenced by plaintiff on January 14, 1997 to recover compensatory and punitive damages predicated on defenda”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsGewirtz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Allan L. Winick, J. Plaintiff Evan Gewirtz moves to strike the first, second and third affirmative defenses of defendant’s answer. Defendant cross-moves to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint. *601This action was commenced, to recover the proceeds of an insurance policy allegedly covering defendant Jame”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsAin Leasing Corp. v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Allan L. Winick, J. Defendant Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. (Peat, Marwick) *903moves to reargue a decision of this court (Winick, J., Aug. 24, 1995) which granted plaintiffs motion compelling defendant to respond to plaintiff’s notice of discovery and inspection. Plaintiff has now conceded that d”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsVarveris v. Fisher
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Allan L. Winick, J. Defendants Patricia Emma and David Ferguson (hereinafter Fergusons) in this mortgage foreclosure action have asked this *418court to permanently stay the sale of their house directed to be sold under a judgment of foreclosure as amended by an order dated December 12, 1990. Plai”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsRoyal Indemnity Co. v. Love
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Allan L. Winick, J. Defendant, Derrick Nash, moves for an order granting summary judgment and directing the plaintiff insurance company to defend and indemnify Vincent Love. Plaintiff, Royal *891Indemnity Company (Royal), commenced a declaratory judgment action asking this court to declare that pl”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsLong Island Lighting Co. v. Trigen-Nassau Energy Corp.
“ *210OPINION OF THE COURT Allan L. Winick, J. Application by petitioner Long Island Lighting Company (LILCO) to stay the arbitration noticed by respondent TrigenNassau Energy Corp. (Trigen) pursuant to CPLR article 78 is denied. Pursuant to the Parallel Generation Agreement (the Agreement) between LILCO and Trigen date”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsFrawley v. Albrecht
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Allan L. Winick, J. Plaintiff in action No. 2 moves for an order, pursuant to CPLR 3101 (d) (2), compelling discovery and inspection of all prior written and recorded statements given by nonparty witnesses to the defendant and/or her insurance carrier. Plaintiff’s action arose out of a motor vehic”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsLevy v. Nassau County Board of Elections
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Allan L. Winick, J. Petitioner, pursuant to section 16-102 (3) of the Election Law, asks this court to direct the Board of Elections of Nassau County to conduct a new primary election for the Republican candidate for the Office of Member of Congress for the Fourth Congressional District in that Co”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsIncorporated Village of Cedarhurst v. Hanover Insurance
“ *796OPINION OF THE COURT Allan L. Winick, J. Defendant moves to consolidate two actions arising out of similar incidents. Defendant also moves to dismiss the complaint in each of the actions. Plaintiff cross-moves for summary judgment in each of the actions. Plaintiff has no opposition to the joinder of the two action”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsBoard of Education v. Sobol
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Allan L. Winick, J. Proceeding by Baldwin Union Free School District for judgment pursuant to CPLR article 78 and New York State Education Law § 4404 (3) vacating and setting aside the determination of Henry A. Fernandez, as State Review Officer (SRO), is denied and the SRO’s decision is affirmed ”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsLevin v. Levin
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Allan L. Winick, J. Defendant moves to adjudge plaintiff to be in contempt of this court for his alleged refusal to comply with orders of this court, to enter a judgment against plaintiff and for an award of counsel fees. *389The court in its pendente lite decision (Winick, J., Apr. 20, 1990) dire”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsYoushah v. Staudinger
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Allan L. Winick, J. An inquest, as a result of a default, was ordered by another Justice of this court. Testimony was taken in open court which revealed that plaintiff invested money in an escort and dating service. A corporation, Perry Blais, Inc., was formed to *351carry on the business. The ser”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsPeople ex rel. Moore v. Jablonsky
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Allan L. Winick, J. Petitioner makes an application for a writ of habeas corpus to release him from confinement pursuant to CPL 180.80 or, in the alternative, conditionally release him unless the District Court Judge conducts a proper felony examination pursuant to CPL 180.60. Petitioner, Kenneth ”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsToffler v. Pokorny
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Allan L. Winick, J. Petitioner Michael Toffler moves to "dismiss” a pending *704arbitration proceeding between himself and respondent Martin Pokorny. Petitioner Toffler is a periodontist licensed to practice in New York State. Respondent Pokorny is a dentist licensed to practice in New York State.”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsColonial Penn Insurance v. Curry
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Allan L. Winick, J. Petitioner Colonial Penn Insurance Company moves for an order pursuant to CPLR 7503 (b) permanently staying an uninsured motorist arbitration demanded by James Curry, the respondent. A hearing was directed by a Justice of this court (Hart, J., Feb. 2, 1993) and after the hearin”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsMatter of Frome v. Bd. of Elections of Nassau County
Matter of Frome v. Bd. of Elections of Nassau County
“ 57 N.Y.2d 741 (1982) In the Matter of Steven J. Frome et al., Appellants, v. Board of Elections of Nassau County et al., Respondents. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Argued September 9, 1982. Decided September 10, 1982. Pamela Schwartz Frome for appellants. Edward G. McCabe, County Attorney (Arthur Eiberson”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsMatter of Frome v. Bd. of Elections of Nassau County
“ 57 N.Y.2d 741 (1982) In the Matter of Steven J. Frome et al., Appellants, v. Board of Elections of Nassau County et al., Respondents. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Argued September 9, 1982. Decided September 10, 1982. Pamela Schwartz Frome for appellants. Edward G. McCabe, County Attorney (Arthur Eiberson”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsFrome v. Board of Elections of Nassau County
Frome v. Board of Elections of Nassau County
“ Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Oppido, J.), dated August 27, 1982, which, inter alia, granted applications to invalidate the designating petitions of the appellants. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, proceedings to invalidate the designating petitions are dismi”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsFrome v. Board of Elections of Nassau County
“ Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Oppido, J.), dated August 27, 1982, which, inter alia, granted applications to invalidate the designating petitions of the appellants. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, proceedings to invalidate the designating petitions are dismi”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsHarwood v. Dodd
Harwood v. Dodd
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Order affirmed, without costs. We cannot say that the determination of the Appellate Division was erroneous as a matter of law. Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer. ”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsHarwood v. Dodd
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Order affirmed, without costs. We cannot say that the determination of the Appellate Division was erroneous as a matter of law. Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer. ”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsRosenthal v. Harwood
Rosenthal v. Harwood
“ Jones, J. We hold invalid as applied to a candidate for judicial office a provision of the internal by-laws of a political party limiting nominations by that party to one who has agreed to refuse to accept, the nomination of any other political party. Article VII (§ 1, subd. f) of the by-laws of the Nassau County Demo”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsRosenthal v. Harwood
“ Jones, J. We hold invalid as applied to a candidate for judicial office a provision of the internal by-laws of a political party limiting nominations by that party to one who has agreed to refuse to accept, the nomination of any other political party. Article VII (§ 1, subd. f) of the by-laws of the Nassau County Demo”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsBaker v. Jensen
Baker v. Jensen
“ In each proceeding: Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion. Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Scileppi, Bebgan, Heating, Beeitel, Jasen and Steueb *. Designated pursuant to section 2 of article VI of the State Constitution in place of Burke, J., disqualified. ”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsBaker v. Jensen
“ In each proceeding: Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion. Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Scileppi, Bebgan, Heating, Beeitel, Jasen and Steueb *. Designated pursuant to section 2 of article VI of the State Constitution in place of Burke, J., disqualified. ”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsHarrington v. Jensen
Harrington v. Jensen
“ On the court’s own motion, the order herein dated October 8, 1968 is vacated, the decision slip dated the same day is withdrawn, and the following is substituted as the decision herein: Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated October 3, 1968, which, inter alia, (1) declared valid certificates”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsHarrington v. Jensen
“ On the court’s own motion, the order herein dated October 8, 1968 is vacated, the decision slip dated the same day is withdrawn, and the following is substituted as the decision herein: Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated October 3, 1968, which, inter alia, (1) declared valid certificates”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsIn re the Estate of Wolf
In re the Estate of Wolf
“ Lewis, Ch. J. The petitioner-appellant, Betsy Wolf, mother of Frank Wolf, deceased, and one of two administratrices with the will annexed of the estate of the decedent, instituted this proceeding in Surrogate’s Court, New York County, for a decree instructing her as to the legal basis for computing the share of the de”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsIn re the Estate of Wolf
“ Lewis, Ch. J. The petitioner-appellant, Betsy Wolf, mother of Frank Wolf, deceased, and one of two administratrices with the will annexed of the estate of the decedent, instituted this proceeding in Surrogate’s Court, New York County, for a decree instructing her as to the legal basis for computing the share of the de”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsPublic web mentions
Negative results found on the public web by automated search. These are unverified mentions from third-party sites — not official records, not allegations by this directory, and not findings of fact. Each entry links to the original page so you can read it in context.
No negative web results located yet — this profile is queued for the next automated sweep
Evidence submitted on this platform
Documents and case facts submitted through the case-analysis and investigation tools and attached permanently to Judge Allan L. Winick. Each entry is an allegation by the person who submitted it, published with its origin and evidence level — not a finding of fact by this directory.
No case-analysis evidence attached to this profile yet
Sign in to attach evidence from a case you analysed. A case number is required.
Court calendars
Appearance dates for this name across the New York courts, taken from published court calendars and public argument records. Anyone can read this section.
Court calendars — public listings
Calendar entries are public court listings located by name match and kept with their official source link. Court calendars change daily and names repeat — confirm every date on the court's own calendar before relying on it. A listing is not an allegation and not a finding about anyone.
Reading the published court calendars…
No future date for this name has appeared on a published calendar yet. The collector re-checks every court calendar automatically — use the official calendar search routes below in the meantime.
Appearance search (all ten courts)
Supreme and County Court civil appearances, calendars by justice, attorney and index number.
Criminal Court and County Court criminal appearance dates and parts.
Local civil courts, including NYC Civil Court appearance calendars.
Filed documents and scheduled conference dates in e-filed cases.
Court calendars & parts
Daily calendars published by the Unified Court System.
Court addresses, parts, clerks and published part rules.
Family and Surrogate's Court terms, parts and public calendar notices.
Claims against the State: calendars, decisions and judge assignments.
Appellate calendars
Arguments before the state's highest court.
AD1 argument and motion calendars.
AD2 argument and motion calendars.
AD3 argument calendars.
AD4 argument calendars.
Appellate Term calendars for the lower courts.
Recorded and scheduled oral arguments in public court records.
Court record research
Search public appellate decisions and federal dockets that name this person — judge, attorney or court clerk. Name matches are research leads, never findings.
Name-match research — not a finding
These are appeals and federal filings located by public name search. A person's name appearing in a case does not mean they were accused of anything, and names repeat — always open the docket before drawing any conclusion.
Appeals of orders
Federal filings
Comparative research
Pick a procedural pattern and compare how each Appellate Division department handled it. These are published decisions located by text search — comparisons, not findings about any person.
Best-interest findings, attorney for the child, Lincoln hearings, custody or neglect appeals.
Appellate Division, First Department
New York, Bronx
Appellate Division, Second Department
Kings, Queens, Richmond, Nassau, Suffolk, Westchester, Rockland, Orange, Putnam, Dutchess
Appellate Division, Third Department
Albany, Broome, Chemung, Clinton, Columbia, Cortland, Delaware, Essex, Franklin, Fulton, Greene, Hamilton, Madison, Montgomery, Otsego, Rensselaer, St. Lawrence, Saratoga, Schenectady, Schoharie, Schuyler, Sullivan, Tioga, Tompkins, Ulster, Warren, Washington
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Erie, Monroe, Onondaga, Oneida, Niagara, Allegany, Cattaraugus, Cayuga, Chautauqua, Genesee, Herkimer, Jefferson, Lewis, Livingston, Ontario, Orleans, Oswego, Seneca, Steuben, Wayne, Wyoming, Yates
Full public footprint — Judge Allan L. Winick
Every appeal, complaint, oversight report, nonprofit filing, personal lawsuit and press mention that public sources expose for this name. Name-match only: confirm the identity in the source before treating any item as this person's record, and never treat an allegation or investigation as a finding.
Appeals & court records
Every appellate and trial record that names the person.
Complaints & discipline
Formal complaint and discipline records for judges, attorneys and court staff.
Attorney General & state oversight
AG investigations and reports, Comptroller audits, and ethics-commission filings.
Nonprofit, employment & personal matters
Board or employment separations, charity governance, and lawsuits the person is a party to.
Press & public record trail
Contemporaneous reporting, which often dates events the official record only implies.
Department territory: AD1 — 2 counties · AD2 — 10 counties · AD3 — 27 counties · AD4 — 22 counties
Docket pull & analysis
Pulls every docket and decision public court records return for this judge, then flags neutral metadata patterns: long-pending cases, appellate reversals, child-safeguard matters and civil-rights claims. Official court calendars are linked for the state cases the API does not carry.
Metadata analysis — not an adjudication
This pulls every docket and decision the public court-records API returns for this judge's name, then flags patterns from dates and captions alone: long-pending cases, appellate reversals, child and family safeguards, civil-rights claims. Flags are prompts to read the record, never conclusions about the judge.
Official court calendars
Docket search
Pattern analysis
Themes are counted by distinct cases, not by review count, and are never treated as proof of misconduct.
No recurring theme reaches the reporting threshold
Public feedback
Each review shows its own verification level. A verified reviewer is not a verified allegation.
No published feedback yet
Right to respond
Judges and attorneys may publish a response. Responses are never edited for content and are never rated.
No response published
Contribute
A verified account is required
Feedback is only accepted from a verified reviewer: sign in with Google, or register by email and confirm your address. Your identity is never shown publicly.
Sign in to give feedbackOfficial information
Official record
Court contact information is not a private communication channel
Do not use this contact information for prohibited ex parte communications or to argue a pending case directly with a judge. Court filings and case communications must follow the applicable court rules and filing procedures.
Report a judicial conduct concern
Complaints about the conduct of a New York State judge are filed with the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct. The Commission — not this directory — determines whether misconduct occurred.
Full oversight directory in Civil Watchdog →Provenance
Every directory field carries its source, tier, retrieval date and verification date. Changes are kept, not overwritten.
No source records yet
Primary source: Public Determinations of the NYS Commission on Judicial Conduct — data.ny.gov