Justice · Spring Valley Village Court And Ramapo Town Court
Independent public-information platform. Not affiliated with the New York State Unified Court System.
Ratings and reviews reflect individual user experiences and are not findings of judicial misconduct, attorney misconduct, illegality, bias, corruption, or professional discipline. Official findings are displayed separately and linked to their authoritative source.
Public experience
Derived only from verified reviewer feedback, with the full formula published. This is not an official measure of performance.
Public experience
INSUFFICIENT VERIFIED FEEDBACK
0 verified reviews · 0 unique cases · 0 total submissions
Rating confidence
Insufficient
Early feedback — insufficient sample for a reliable public score (0 of 5 verified reviews).
No category ratings from verified reviewers yet
Trend
By case type
No case-type breakdown yet.
Separation of evidence
Public feedback, document-supported claims and official findings are counted separately and never merged into a single accusation number.
Claim ledger — never combined
Authoritative record
Only determinations by a court, appellate panel, grievance committee, judicial-conduct commission or comparable authority appear here.
New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct public determination (2016): Removal.
Outcome: Removal
Public Determinations of the NYS Commission on Judicial Conduct — data.ny.govContinuously monitored public record
Found automatically by name in public appellate, federal and disciplinary records and refreshed on a schedule. Documents are grouped into distinct cases by docket number. These are research leads, matched by name only — confirm each document before treating it as this person's case.
Desir v. Simon
Desir v. Simon
“ Desir v Simon (2025 NY Slip Op 01206) Desir v Simon 2025 NY Slip Op 01206 Decided on March 5, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. ”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsDesir v. Simon
“ Desir v Simon (2025 NY Slip Op 01206) Desir v Simon 2025 NY Slip Op 01206 Decided on March 5, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. ”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsMatter of Cheron v. Simon
Matter of Cheron v. Simon
“ Matter of Cheron v Simon (2023 NY Slip Op 02509) Matter of Cheron v Simon 2023 NY Slip Op 02509 Decided on May 10, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.<”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsMatter of Cheron v. Simon
“ Matter of Cheron v Simon (2023 NY Slip Op 02509) Matter of Cheron v Simon 2023 NY Slip Op 02509 Decided on May 10, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.<”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsWatson v. Evans
Watson v. Evans
CourtListener RECAP — federal docketsWatson v. Evans
CourtListener RECAP — federal docketsRegency Vil. Mgt. v. Morris
Regency Vil. Mgt. v. Morris
“ Regency Village Management, Respondent, againstEugene Morris and Constance Williams, Tenants, George Hancock, Appellant, et al., Undertenants. Legal Aid Society of Rockland County, Inc. (Aimee M. Pollack, Esq.), for appellant. Wilf Law Firm, LLP (Mark A. Rothberg, Esq.), for respondent. Appeal from an o”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsRegency Vil. Mgt. v. Morris
“ Regency Village Management, Respondent, againstEugene Morris and Constance Williams, Tenants, George Hancock, Appellant, et al., Undertenants. Legal Aid Society of Rockland County, Inc. (Aimee M. Pollack, Esq.), for appellant. Wilf Law Firm, LLP (Mark A. Rothberg, Esq.), for respondent. Appeal from an o”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsPeople v. Davis (Tina)
People v. Davis (Tina)
“ The People of the State of New York, Respondent, againstTina Davis, Appellant. Rockland County Public Defender (Ellen O'Hara Woods, Esq.), for appellant. District Attorney Rockland County (Carrie A. Ciganek), for respondent. Appeal, as limited by the brief, from sentences of the Justice Court of the Vil”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsPeople v. Davis (Tina)
“ The People of the State of New York, Respondent, againstTina Davis, Appellant. Rockland County Public Defender (Ellen O'Hara Woods, Esq.), for appellant. District Attorney Rockland County (Carrie A. Ciganek), for respondent. Appeal, as limited by the brief, from sentences of the Justice Court of the Vil”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsThe Matter of the Honorable Alan M. Simon a Justice of the Spring Valley Village Court and the Ramapo Town Court, Rockland County
The Matter of the Honorable Alan M. Simon a Justice of the Spring Valley Village Court and the Ramapo Town Court, Rockland County
“ *37 OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. At the request of petitioner, Alan M. Simon, we review a determination of the State Commission on Judicial Conduct, which sustained six charges of misconduct against petitioner and recommended that he be removed from his judicial offices. Petitio”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsThe Matter of the Honorable Alan M. Simon a Justice of the Spring Valley Village Court and the Ramapo Town Court, Rockland County
“ *37 OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. At the request of petitioner, Alan M. Simon, we review a determination of the State Commission on Judicial Conduct, which sustained six charges of misconduct against petitioner and recommended that he be removed from his judicial offices. Petitio”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsIn re Simon
In re Simon
“ Motion by James D. Licata, Rockland County Public Defender, for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the request for review herein dismissed as untimely (see Rules of Ct of Appeals [22 NYCRR] § 500.23 [a]). ”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsIn re Simon
“ Motion by James D. Licata, Rockland County Public Defender, for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the request for review herein dismissed as untimely (see Rules of Ct of Appeals [22 NYCRR] § 500.23 [a]). ”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsIn re Simon
“ OPINION OF THE COURT On the Court’s own motion, it is determined that the Honorable Alan M. Simon is suspended, with pay, effective immediately, from the offices of Justice of the Spring Valley Village Court, Rockland County, and the Ramapo Town Court, Rockland County, and the office of Acting Justice of the Hill-burn”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsDavitt v. Rockland County
Davitt v. Rockland County
CourtListener RECAP — federal docketsDavitt v. Rockland County
CourtListener RECAP — federal docketsAffordable Community, Inc. v. Simon
Affordable Community, Inc. v. Simon
“ In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (O. Bellantoni, J.), dated February 10, 2011, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with cost”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsAffordable Community, Inc. v. Simon
“ In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (O. Bellantoni, J.), dated February 10, 2011, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with cost”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsAttorney General v. Simon
“ OPINION OF THE COURT James D. Pagones, J. The petitioner moves, by order to show cause, for a preliminary injunction staying the commencement of an evidentiary hearing by respondent Alan M. Simon, of the Spring Valley Justice Court, to consider a petition by Keith Meyers, pursuant to Correction Law § 168-o (2) “reliev”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsSimon v. New York State Board of Real Property Services
Simon v. New York State Board of Real Property Services
“ Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 and RPTL 1218 to review a determination of the New York State Board of Real Property Services, dated March 28, 2000, which established a final State equalization rate of 28.86% for the 1999 assessment roll of the Town of Ramapo. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and th”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsSimon v. New York State Board of Real Property Services
“ Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 and RPTL 1218 to review a determination of the New York State Board of Real Property Services, dated March 28, 2000, which established a final State equalization rate of 28.86% for the 1999 assessment roll of the Town of Ramapo. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and th”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsIn re Delhomme
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Alfred J. Weiner, J. Ordered that this motion is disposed of as follows: This is an application by petitioners for an order staying or suspending the execution of judgment pending determination of an appeal pursuant to CPL 460.50. The application is opposed by respondent. Petitioners were found gu”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsChurchill Mortgage Investment Corp. - Adversary Proceeding
Churchill Mortgage Investment Corp. - Adversary Proceeding
CourtListener RECAP — federal docketsChurchill Mortgage Investment Corp. - Adversary Proceeding
CourtListener RECAP — federal docketsVillage of Chestnut Ridge v. Howard
Village of Chestnut Ridge v. Howard
“ *720OPINION OF THE COURT Ciparick, J. The question presented on this appeal is which of two municipalities, the Town of Ramapo or the Village of Chestnut Ridge, is responsible for the maintenance and repair of a severely deteriorated road structure. The answer to this question hinges upon whether the structure is a “b”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsVillage of Chestnut Ridge v. Howard
“ *720OPINION OF THE COURT Ciparick, J. The question presented on this appeal is which of two municipalities, the Town of Ramapo or the Village of Chestnut Ridge, is responsible for the maintenance and repair of a severely deteriorated road structure. The answer to this question hinges upon whether the structure is a “b”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsSims v. Town of Ramapo
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Howard Miller, J. This matter came on before me for trial on June 1, 1998, and the defendants requested the court charge the “reckless disregard” standard, rather than the ordinary negligence charge, upon the basis that defendant Officer Thomas E. Hatch was engaged in an emergency operation, as de”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsAlan M. Simon v. Basic Designs Inc
Alan M. Simon v. Basic Designs Inc
CourtListener RECAP — federal docketsAlan M. Simon v. Basic Designs Inc
CourtListener RECAP — federal docketsIn re Shapiro
In re Shapiro
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. The petition contains 10 charges of professional misconduct against the respondent. The Special Referee sustained all of the charges. The Grievance Committee now moves to confirm the report of the Special Referee. The respondent cross-moves to disaffirm the report and to dismiss the ch”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsIn re Shapiro
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. The petition contains 10 charges of professional misconduct against the respondent. The Special Referee sustained all of the charges. The Grievance Committee now moves to confirm the report of the Special Referee. The respondent cross-moves to disaffirm the report and to dismiss the ch”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsVillage of Chestnut Ridge v. Howard
“ OPINION OF THE COURT George M. Bergerman, J. This is a CPLR article 78 proceeding by the petitioner which seeks an order of mandamus (1) directing respondents to post *746three ton-load-limit signs on the street known as Pine Brook Road in the Village of Chestnut Ridge on the bridge located there and on all approaches”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsUnited States Trust Co. v. Town of Ramapo
“ *932OPINION OF THE COURT Howard Miller, J. It is ordered that the motion by plaintiff for partial summary judgment on plaintiff’s second cause of action is granted to the extent that plaintiff may enter judgment declaring that the failure of the Town of Ramapo (Town) to provide actual notice to plaintiff prior to the ”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsCounty of Rockland v. Town of Clarkstown
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Kenneth W. Rudolph, J. The County of Rockland (Rockland) maintains separate proceedings against the Town of Clarkstown (Clarkstown) and *368the Town of Ramapo (Ramapo) to compel the subject Towns to add deficits caused by County revenue chargebacks to the Town’s portion of each annual budget pursu”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsProperty Valuation Analysts, Inc. v. Williams
Property Valuation Analysts, Inc. v. Williams
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Yesawich, Jr., J. Petitioner is a corporation engaged in the business of representing property owners who seek to challenge their real property assessments. Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law (Public Officers Law art 6) (hereinafter FOIL), petitioner demanded from respondent Assessor of th”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsProperty Valuation Analysts, Inc. v. Williams
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Yesawich, Jr., J. Petitioner is a corporation engaged in the business of representing property owners who seek to challenge their real property assessments. Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law (Public Officers Law art 6) (hereinafter FOIL), petitioner demanded from respondent Assessor of th”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsIn re Tirelli
In re Tirelli
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. The respondent was admitted to practice by this court on March 22, 1967, under the name Louis Anthony Tirelli. On January 22, 1988, respondent was convicted after trial *276by a jury in the County Court, Rockland County, of attempted grand larceny in the third degree in violation of Pe”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsIn re Tirelli
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. The respondent was admitted to practice by this court on March 22, 1967, under the name Louis Anthony Tirelli. On January 22, 1988, respondent was convicted after trial *276by a jury in the County Court, Rockland County, of attempted grand larceny in the third degree in violation of Pe”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsIn re Leslie K.
In re Leslie K.
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Weinstein, J. The instant appeal emanates from allegations that the appellant, the father of Linda K., had sexually abused his daughter, a child under 18 years of age. With respect to evidence admissible in child protective proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, Family Court Act § 10”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsIn re Leslie K.
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Weinstein, J. The instant appeal emanates from allegations that the appellant, the father of Linda K., had sexually abused his daughter, a child under 18 years of age. With respect to evidence admissible in child protective proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, Family Court Act § 10”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsIn re Sanjivini K.
In re Sanjivini K.
“ Gabrielli, J. (dissenting). I dissent and vote to affirm, for all the well-documented reasons stated by the Appellate Division. First, I do not agree with the majority that the present proceeding, instituted pursuant to section 392 of the Social Services Law, is not the "appropriate judicial vehicle in which to determ”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsIn re Sanjivini K.
“ Gabrielli, J. (dissenting). I dissent and vote to affirm, for all the well-documented reasons stated by the Appellate Division. First, I do not agree with the majority that the present proceeding, instituted pursuant to section 392 of the Social Services Law, is not the "appropriate judicial vehicle in which to determ”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsPeople ex rel. Gibbs v. Vincent
People ex rel. Gibbs v. Vincent
“ Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division is affirmed. Relator, not having objected at the criminal trial to the introduction of the knife on constitutional grounds nor having otherwise called the court’s attention to such a question at the time of trial or on appeal (29 NY2d 754), is deemed to have waived the i”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsPeople ex rel. Gibbs v. Vincent
“ Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division is affirmed. Relator, not having objected at the criminal trial to the introduction of the knife on constitutional grounds nor having otherwise called the court’s attention to such a question at the time of trial or on appeal (29 NY2d 754), is deemed to have waived the i”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsTurner v. State
Turner v. State
“ Sweeney, J. Claimant was employed by the Research Foundation of the State University of New York as director of the high school equivalency program at State University at Stony Brook. Claimant’s services were ultimately terminated and he filed a claim against the State for loss of salary, refundable disbursements and ”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsTurner v. State
“ Sweeney, J. Claimant was employed by the Research Foundation of the State University of New York as director of the high school equivalency program at State University at Stony Brook. Claimant’s services were ultimately terminated and he filed a claim against the State for loss of salary, refundable disbursements and ”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsPeople v. Schmidt
People v. Schmidt
“ Order affirmed; no opinion. Concur: Chief Judge Bbeitel and Judges Jasen, Gabbielli, Jones,, Waohtlbb, Rabin and Stevens. ”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsPeople v. Schmidt
“ Order affirmed; no opinion. Concur: Chief Judge Bbeitel and Judges Jasen, Gabbielli, Jones,, Waohtlbb, Rabin and Stevens. ”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsPublic web mentions
Negative results found on the public web by automated search. These are unverified mentions from third-party sites — not official records, not allegations by this directory, and not findings of fact. Each entry links to the original page so you can read it in context.
Spring Valley Mayor Alan Simon curses out trustee, fires director during rant
“<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMirAFBVV95cUxOdVlMWVVPZVByTVNvbjRxU2dnc3lHbndyR1JMRFNsN1dRbHoyaDZIVkVZS1JzX0N5ck10eUpCSHZsVWF0SFVFTlNHeTdnajhfOXdqa2wxV1FsaC1NTENNeVVEci15bWxUTEwwVUFyOWF6bnBnYTlsRTdxNzdQZ2VYME5PQTlraGJNY3dUbTJKVUpISDFhdk1oUjNEMTZoZGd1QkRGek9QSTRqRnBj?oc=5" target="_blank">Spring Valley Mayor Alan Simon curses out trustee, fires director during rant</a> <font color="”
Read at The Journal News | lohud.com →Who's running in Rockland in the Nov. 7 election
“<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiqwFBVV95cUxOY2dfLXU5YUU5elVQSVd2WVdoV1UzYWlRUWJDZ1pQTU10c3hsTEZrOFdtemtxUlhyNUFSdEpBc2U0VGFPOFlDOXFVQnlsdHJuR2g0X05RTDJxOXVvaWF3eTVJN1EzV1JDSlA3Y09McE9NSndBdkRNY1FxTXJjaE9feF9Dd1pmcWtnSGlwQjVXT2pyeG45ZGp2RFVVRHRrRmIzdmVQSnZJOXIxelE?oc=5" target="_blank">Who's running in Rockland in the Nov. 7 election</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">The Journal News | lo”
Read at The Journal News | lohud.com →Evidence submitted on this platform
Documents and case facts submitted through the case-analysis and investigation tools and attached permanently to Justice Alan M. Simon. Each entry is an allegation by the person who submitted it, published with its origin and evidence level — not a finding of fact by this directory.
No case-analysis evidence attached to this profile yet
Sign in to attach evidence from a case you analysed. A case number is required.
Court calendars
Appearance dates for this name across the New York courts, taken from published court calendars and public argument records. Anyone can read this section.
Court calendars — public listings
Calendar entries are public court listings located by name match and kept with their official source link. Court calendars change daily and names repeat — confirm every date on the court's own calendar before relying on it. A listing is not an allegation and not a finding about anyone.
Reading the published court calendars…
No future date for this name has appeared on a published calendar yet. The collector re-checks every court calendar automatically — use the official calendar search routes below in the meantime.
Appearance search (all ten courts)
Supreme and County Court civil appearances, calendars by justice, attorney and index number.
Criminal Court and County Court criminal appearance dates and parts.
Local civil courts, including NYC Civil Court appearance calendars.
Filed documents and scheduled conference dates in e-filed cases.
Court calendars & parts
Daily calendars published by the Unified Court System.
Court addresses, parts, clerks and published part rules.
Family and Surrogate's Court terms, parts and public calendar notices.
Claims against the State: calendars, decisions and judge assignments.
Appellate calendars
Arguments before the state's highest court.
AD1 argument and motion calendars.
AD2 argument and motion calendars.
AD3 argument calendars.
AD4 argument calendars.
Appellate Term calendars for the lower courts.
Recorded and scheduled oral arguments in public court records.
Court record research
Search public appellate decisions and federal dockets that name this person — judge, attorney or court clerk. Name matches are research leads, never findings.
Name-match research — not a finding
These are appeals and federal filings located by public name search. A person's name appearing in a case does not mean they were accused of anything, and names repeat — always open the docket before drawing any conclusion.
Appeals of orders
Federal filings
Comparative research
Pick a procedural pattern and compare how each Appellate Division department handled it. These are published decisions located by text search — comparisons, not findings about any person.
Best-interest findings, attorney for the child, Lincoln hearings, custody or neglect appeals.
Appellate Division, First Department
New York, Bronx
Appellate Division, Second Department
Kings, Queens, Richmond, Nassau, Suffolk, Westchester, Rockland, Orange, Putnam, Dutchess
Appellate Division, Third Department
Albany, Broome, Chemung, Clinton, Columbia, Cortland, Delaware, Essex, Franklin, Fulton, Greene, Hamilton, Madison, Montgomery, Otsego, Rensselaer, St. Lawrence, Saratoga, Schenectady, Schoharie, Schuyler, Sullivan, Tioga, Tompkins, Ulster, Warren, Washington
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Erie, Monroe, Onondaga, Oneida, Niagara, Allegany, Cattaraugus, Cayuga, Chautauqua, Genesee, Herkimer, Jefferson, Lewis, Livingston, Ontario, Orleans, Oswego, Seneca, Steuben, Wayne, Wyoming, Yates
Full public footprint — Justice Alan M. Simon
Every appeal, complaint, oversight report, nonprofit filing, personal lawsuit and press mention that public sources expose for this name. Name-match only: confirm the identity in the source before treating any item as this person's record, and never treat an allegation or investigation as a finding.
Appeals & court records
Every appellate and trial record that names the person.
Complaints & discipline
Formal complaint and discipline records for judges, attorneys and court staff.
Attorney General & state oversight
AG investigations and reports, Comptroller audits, and ethics-commission filings.
Nonprofit, employment & personal matters
Board or employment separations, charity governance, and lawsuits the person is a party to.
Press & public record trail
Contemporaneous reporting, which often dates events the official record only implies.
Department territory: AD1 — 2 counties · AD2 — 10 counties · AD3 — 27 counties · AD4 — 22 counties
Docket pull & analysis
Pulls every docket and decision public court records return for this judge, then flags neutral metadata patterns: long-pending cases, appellate reversals, child-safeguard matters and civil-rights claims. Official court calendars are linked for the state cases the API does not carry.
Metadata analysis — not an adjudication
This pulls every docket and decision the public court-records API returns for this judge's name, then flags patterns from dates and captions alone: long-pending cases, appellate reversals, child and family safeguards, civil-rights claims. Flags are prompts to read the record, never conclusions about the judge.
Official court calendars
Docket search
Pattern analysis
Themes are counted by distinct cases, not by review count, and are never treated as proof of misconduct.
No recurring theme reaches the reporting threshold
Public feedback
Each review shows its own verification level. A verified reviewer is not a verified allegation.
No published feedback yet
Right to respond
Judges and attorneys may publish a response. Responses are never edited for content and are never rated.
No response published
Contribute
A verified account is required
Feedback is only accepted from a verified reviewer: sign in with Google, or register by email and confirm your address. Your identity is never shown publicly.
Sign in to give feedbackOfficial information
Official record
Court contact information is not a private communication channel
Do not use this contact information for prohibited ex parte communications or to argue a pending case directly with a judge. Court filings and case communications must follow the applicable court rules and filing procedures.
Report a judicial conduct concern
Complaints about the conduct of a New York State judge are filed with the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct. The Commission — not this directory — determines whether misconduct occurred.
Full oversight directory in Civil Watchdog →Provenance
Every directory field carries its source, tier, retrieval date and verification date. Changes are kept, not overwritten.
No source records yet
Primary source: Public Determinations of the NYS Commission on Judicial Conduct — data.ny.gov