None
Independent public-information platform. Not affiliated with the New York State Unified Court System.
Ratings and reviews reflect individual user experiences and are not findings of judicial misconduct, attorney misconduct, illegality, bias, corruption, or professional discipline. Official findings are displayed separately and linked to their authoritative source.
Affiliations
Current and previous organizations named in this person's public registration record. An association is not an assertion of responsibility for the organization's conduct.
New York County
Public experience
Derived only from verified reviewer feedback, with the full formula published. This is not an official measure of performance.
Public experience
INSUFFICIENT VERIFIED FEEDBACK
0 verified reviews · 0 unique cases · 0 total submissions
Rating confidence
Insufficient
Early feedback — insufficient sample for a reliable public score (0 of 5 verified reviews).
No category ratings from verified reviewers yet
Trend
By case type
No case-type breakdown yet.
Separation of evidence
Public feedback, document-supported claims and official findings are counted separately and never merged into a single accusation number.
Claim ledger — never combined
Authoritative record
Only determinations by a court, appellate panel, grievance committee, judicial-conduct commission or comparable authority appear here.
No official finding of misconduct on record in this directory
Continuously monitored public record
Found automatically by name in public appellate, federal and disciplinary records and refreshed on a schedule. Documents are grouped into distinct cases by docket number. These are research leads, matched by name only — confirm each document before treating it as this person's case.
Shawn Danielle Davidson and Nathaniel Richard Davidson
Brown Lopez, et al. v. United States of America, et al.
American Helicopters, Inc.
American Aviation Manassas, LLC
iSun, Inc.
United States v. French
United States v. DeJesus
Millman v. Griffin Pipe Products Co., LLC
The New York Times Company v. Microsoft Corporation
United States v. Izard
Gino v. President and Fellows of Harvard College
Stark Novus Financial Inc.
Richard Davidson
Woodham v. Woodham
United States v. Mallard
United States v. Hall
v.
Edge v. Stericycle, Inc.
United States v. Middlebrooks
KServicing Wind Down Corp.
People v. Davidson
“ Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated November 26, 2014 (People v Davidson, 122 AD3d 939 [2014]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, rendered Ju”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsPeople v. Davidson
“ Application by the respondent for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated November 26, 2014 (People v Davidson, 122 AD3d 937 [2014]), reversing stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau C”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsDavidson v. Miele Sanitation Co.
“ *510In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the third-party defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Nelson, J.), dated April 12, 2005, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint, and the defenda”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsDavidson v. Miele Sanitation Co. NY, Inc.
“ *347Motion by the appellant, in effect, to clarify a decision and order of this Court dated March 22, 2004 [5 AD 3d 623], which determined an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated January 7, 2003. Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsSlater v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.
“ In an action to recover for the wrongful death of plaintiff’s intestate who, plaintiff claims, was struck by the corporate defendant’s trolley car while he was crossing the street, the jury rendered a verdict for plaintiff for $6,000. The court, on a reserved motion, set aside the verdict and dismissed the complaint, ”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsIn re the Estate of Glen
“ McAvoy, J. On March 25, 1932, the decedent, John M. Glen, opened a joint account with the New York Savings Bank in the names of himself and his brother James Glen, the petitioner, payable to either or to the survivor. When the decedent died on July 15, 1934, the balance in this account was $4,234.91, which James Glen ”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsIn re the Estate of Glen
“ Delehanty, S. By appropriate proceedings under section 206-a of the Surrogate’s Court Act petitioner presents a claim to a bank book now in the possession of the estate representative. This book evidences a deposit in a savings bank in the names of deceased and petitioner. The individuals who have been cited have file”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsPublic web mentions
Negative results found on the public web by automated search. These are unverified mentions from third-party sites — not official records, not allegations by this directory, and not findings of fact. Each entry links to the original page so you can read it in context.
No negative web results located yet — this profile is queued for the next automated sweep
Evidence submitted on this platform
Documents and case facts submitted through the case-analysis and investigation tools and attached permanently to Richard Dodge Davidson. Each entry is an allegation by the person who submitted it, published with its origin and evidence level — not a finding of fact by this directory.
No case-analysis evidence attached to this profile yet
Sign in to attach evidence from a case you analysed. A case number is required.
Court calendars
Appearance dates for this name across the New York courts, taken from published court calendars and public argument records. Anyone can read this section.
Court calendars — public listings
Calendar entries are public court listings located by name match and kept with their official source link. Court calendars change daily and names repeat — confirm every date on the court's own calendar before relying on it. A listing is not an allegation and not a finding about anyone.
Reading the published court calendars…
No future date for this name has appeared on a published calendar yet. The collector re-checks every court calendar automatically — use the official calendar search routes below in the meantime.
Appearance search (all ten courts)
Supreme and County Court civil appearances, calendars by justice, attorney and index number.
Criminal Court and County Court criminal appearance dates and parts.
Local civil courts, including NYC Civil Court appearance calendars.
Filed documents and scheduled conference dates in e-filed cases.
Court calendars & parts
Daily calendars published by the Unified Court System.
Court addresses, parts, clerks and published part rules.
Family and Surrogate's Court terms, parts and public calendar notices.
Claims against the State: calendars, decisions and judge assignments.
Appellate calendars
Arguments before the state's highest court.
AD1 argument and motion calendars.
AD2 argument and motion calendars.
AD3 argument calendars.
AD4 argument calendars.
Appellate Term calendars for the lower courts.
Recorded and scheduled oral arguments in public court records.
Court record research
Search public appellate decisions and federal dockets that name this person — judge, attorney or court clerk. Name matches are research leads, never findings.
Name-match research — not a finding
These are appeals and federal filings located by public name search. A person's name appearing in a case does not mean they were accused of anything, and names repeat — always open the docket before drawing any conclusion.
Appeals of orders
Federal filings
Oversight determinations
Comparative research
Pick a procedural pattern and compare how each Appellate Division department handled it. These are published decisions located by text search — comparisons, not findings about any person.
Best-interest findings, attorney for the child, Lincoln hearings, custody or neglect appeals.
Appellate Division, First Department
New York, Bronx
Appellate Division, Second Department
Kings, Queens, Richmond, Nassau, Suffolk, Westchester, Rockland, Orange, Putnam, Dutchess
Appellate Division, Third Department
Albany, Broome, Chemung, Clinton, Columbia, Cortland, Delaware, Essex, Franklin, Fulton, Greene, Hamilton, Madison, Montgomery, Otsego, Rensselaer, St. Lawrence, Saratoga, Schenectady, Schoharie, Schuyler, Sullivan, Tioga, Tompkins, Ulster, Warren, Washington
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Erie, Monroe, Onondaga, Oneida, Niagara, Allegany, Cattaraugus, Cayuga, Chautauqua, Genesee, Herkimer, Jefferson, Lewis, Livingston, Ontario, Orleans, Oswego, Seneca, Steuben, Wayne, Wyoming, Yates
Full public footprint — Richard Dodge Davidson
Every appeal, complaint, oversight report, nonprofit filing, personal lawsuit and press mention that public sources expose for this name. Name-match only: confirm the identity in the source before treating any item as this person's record, and never treat an allegation or investigation as a finding.
Appeals & court records
Every appellate and trial record that names the person.
Complaints & discipline
Formal complaint and discipline records for judges, attorneys and court staff.
Attorney General & state oversight
AG investigations and reports, Comptroller audits, and ethics-commission filings.
Nonprofit, employment & personal matters
Board or employment separations, charity governance, and lawsuits the person is a party to.
Press & public record trail
Contemporaneous reporting, which often dates events the official record only implies.
Department territory: AD1 — 2 counties · AD2 — 10 counties · AD3 — 27 counties · AD4 — 22 counties
Pattern analysis
Themes are counted by distinct cases, not by review count, and are never treated as proof of misconduct.
No recurring theme reaches the reporting threshold
Public feedback
Each review shows its own verification level. A verified reviewer is not a verified allegation.
No published feedback yet
Right to respond
Judges and attorneys may publish a response. Responses are never edited for content and are never rated.
No response published
Contribute
A verified account is required
Feedback is only accepted from a verified reviewer: sign in with Google, or register by email and confirm your address. Your identity is never shown publicly.
Sign in to give feedbackOfficial information
Official record
Contact email · Sign in & subscribe to see contact email
Attorney grievance information
Complaints about a New York attorney are filed with the Attorney Grievance Committee for the judicial department where the attorney practices. Only that committee and the courts can impose discipline.
Full oversight directory in Civil Watchdog →Provenance
Every directory field carries its source, tier, retrieval date and verification date. Changes are kept, not overwritten.
No source records yet
Primary source: NYS Attorney Registrations (Office of Court Administration, NY Unified Court System) — data.ny.gov