Mary Ellen Cronly Attorney At Law · New York
Independent public-information platform. Not affiliated with the New York State Unified Court System.
Ratings and reviews reflect individual user experiences and are not findings of judicial misconduct, attorney misconduct, illegality, bias, corruption, or professional discipline. Official findings are displayed separately and linked to their authoritative source.
Public experience
Derived only from verified reviewer feedback, with the full formula published. This is not an official measure of performance.
Public experience
INSUFFICIENT VERIFIED FEEDBACK
0 verified reviews · 0 unique cases · 0 total submissions
Rating confidence
Insufficient
Early feedback — insufficient sample for a reliable public score (0 of 5 verified reviews).
No category ratings from verified reviewers yet
Trend
By case type
No case-type breakdown yet.
Separation of evidence
Public feedback, document-supported claims and official findings are counted separately and never merged into a single accusation number.
Claim ledger — never combined
Authoritative record
Only determinations by a court, appellate panel, grievance committee, judicial-conduct commission or comparable authority appear here.
No official finding of misconduct on record in this directory
Continuously monitored public record
Found automatically by name in public appellate, federal and disciplinary records and refreshed on a schedule. Documents are grouped into distinct cases by docket number. These are research leads, matched by name only — confirm each document before treating it as this person's case.
McKenzie v. Mirabal
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Carro, J. In this case of first impression, we must decide whether access to the fair market rent appeal process, which is ordi*196narily available only to the first tenant to occupy an apartment which becomes subject to the Rent Stabilization Law (Administrative Code of City of New York, tit 26, ”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsAnsonia Residents Ass'n v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal
“ 75 N.Y.2d 206 (1989) In the Matter of Ansonia Residents Association et al., Appellants-Respondents, v. New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, Respondent. Ansonia Associates, Intervenor-Respondent. Thomas Soja, Individually and as President of the Ansonia Tenants Coalition, Inc., Intervenors-Responde”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsAvon Furniture Leasing, Inc. v. Popolizio
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Ellerin, J. At issue in this CPLR article 78 proceeding is a finding of an "illusory tenancy” by the New York Conciliation and Appeals Board (CAB) which has been vacated by Special Term. Proceedings were initiated before the CAB in March 1983 when David Works, who resided in apartment PH-C at 345 ”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsMATTER OF PERLBINDER v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Bd.
“ 67 N.Y.2d 697 (1986) In the Matter of Barton M. Perlbinder et al., Respondents, v. New York City Conciliation and Appeals Board et al., Appellants. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Decided February 6, 1986. Mary Ellen Cronly and Edward Chazin for New York City Conciliation and Appeals Board, appellant. Gusti”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsSt. Vincent's Hospital & Medical Center v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (109 AD2d 711). *962Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander and Titone concur. ”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsMatter of St. Vincent's Hosp. & Med. Ctr. of New York v. New York State Div. of Hous. & Cmty. Renewal
“ 66 N.Y.2d 959 (1985) In the Matter of St. Vincent's Hospital and Medical Center of New York, Appellant, v. New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, as Successor to New York City Conciliation and Appeals Board, Respondent, and Lilith Agredano et al., Intervenors-Respondents. Court of Appeals of the Sta”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsCale Development Co. v. Conciliation & Appeals Board
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Justice Sullivan (94 AD2d 229). We also note that the Board found that the actual occupants of the apartment under the lease were Robert J. Castle and his wife and that the apartment was not”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsMATTER OF SOMMER v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Bd.
“ 61 N.Y.2d 973 (1984) In the Matter of Viola Sommer, Doing Business as ETE Co., Appellant, v. New York City Conciliation and Appeals Board, Respondent. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Argued February 21, 1984. Decided March 22, 1984. Sherwin Belkin, Gary M. Rosenberg, Nicholas Kamillatos and Mitchell J. Bake”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsCentury Operating Corp. v. Popolizio
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Kaye, J. In December, 1965, while the Lincoln Towers complex in Manhattan was still incomplete, Maurice Rosenberg signed a three-year lease for an apartment there. His lease included a “modification-of-lease rider” containing a two-month rent concession which he received at the outset of his tenan”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinions25 Monroe Place Management Co. v. Conciliation & Appeals Board
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Asch, J. The issue presented in this case is whether the board, based on the record before it, appropriately established the fair market rent for apartment 1C at 25 Monroe Place, the premises in question. Pursuant to applicable statutory and case law, the board, when presented with a tenant’s fair”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsSommer v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board
“ *482OPINION OF THE COURT Bloom, J. In May, 1977, petitioner, the landlord of premises 425 East 58th Street, New York City, leased apartment 24E to Barnwell Industries, Inc., a public corporation, for a period of three years. The lease contained a rider limiting the use of the apartment to Morton L. Kinzler, the presid”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsMATTER OF FANELLI v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Bd.
“ 58 N.Y.2d 952 (1983) In the Matter of Ottavio Fanelli, Appellant, v. New York City Conciliation and Appeals Board, Respondent, and William R. Biery, Intervenor-Respondent. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Decided February 23, 1983. George A. Burrell for appellant. Ellis S. Franke and Mary Ellen Cronly for re”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsPublic web mentions
Negative results found on the public web by automated search. These are unverified mentions from third-party sites — not official records, not allegations by this directory, and not findings of fact. Each entry links to the original page so you can read it in context.
No negative web results located yet — this profile is queued for the next automated sweep
Evidence submitted on this platform
Documents and case facts submitted through the case-analysis and investigation tools and attached permanently to Mary Ellen Cronly. Each entry is an allegation by the person who submitted it, published with its origin and evidence level — not a finding of fact by this directory.
No case-analysis evidence attached to this profile yet
Sign in to attach evidence from a case you analysed. A case number is required.
Court calendars
Appearance dates for this name across the New York courts, taken from published court calendars and public argument records. Anyone can read this section.
Court calendars — public listings
Calendar entries are public court listings located by name match and kept with their official source link. Court calendars change daily and names repeat — confirm every date on the court's own calendar before relying on it. A listing is not an allegation and not a finding about anyone.
Reading the published court calendars…
No future date for this name has appeared on a published calendar yet. The collector re-checks every court calendar automatically — use the official calendar search routes below in the meantime.
Appearance search (all ten courts)
Supreme and County Court civil appearances, calendars by justice, attorney and index number.
Criminal Court and County Court criminal appearance dates and parts.
Local civil courts, including NYC Civil Court appearance calendars.
Filed documents and scheduled conference dates in e-filed cases.
Court calendars & parts
Daily calendars published by the Unified Court System.
Court addresses, parts, clerks and published part rules.
Family and Surrogate's Court terms, parts and public calendar notices.
Claims against the State: calendars, decisions and judge assignments.
Appellate calendars
Arguments before the state's highest court.
AD1 argument and motion calendars.
AD2 argument and motion calendars.
AD3 argument calendars.
AD4 argument calendars.
Appellate Term calendars for the lower courts.
Recorded and scheduled oral arguments in public court records.
Court record research
Search public appellate decisions and federal dockets that name this person — judge, attorney or court clerk. Name matches are research leads, never findings.
Name-match research — not a finding
These are appeals and federal filings located by public name search. A person's name appearing in a case does not mean they were accused of anything, and names repeat — always open the docket before drawing any conclusion.
Appeals of orders
Federal filings
Oversight determinations
Comparative research
Pick a procedural pattern and compare how each Appellate Division department handled it. These are published decisions located by text search — comparisons, not findings about any person.
Best-interest findings, attorney for the child, Lincoln hearings, custody or neglect appeals.
Appellate Division, First Department
New York, Bronx
Appellate Division, Second Department
Kings, Queens, Richmond, Nassau, Suffolk, Westchester, Rockland, Orange, Putnam, Dutchess
Appellate Division, Third Department
Albany, Broome, Chemung, Clinton, Columbia, Cortland, Delaware, Essex, Franklin, Fulton, Greene, Hamilton, Madison, Montgomery, Otsego, Rensselaer, St. Lawrence, Saratoga, Schenectady, Schoharie, Schuyler, Sullivan, Tioga, Tompkins, Ulster, Warren, Washington
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Erie, Monroe, Onondaga, Oneida, Niagara, Allegany, Cattaraugus, Cayuga, Chautauqua, Genesee, Herkimer, Jefferson, Lewis, Livingston, Ontario, Orleans, Oswego, Seneca, Steuben, Wayne, Wyoming, Yates
Full public footprint — Mary Ellen Cronly
Every appeal, complaint, oversight report, nonprofit filing, personal lawsuit and press mention that public sources expose for this name. Name-match only: confirm the identity in the source before treating any item as this person's record, and never treat an allegation or investigation as a finding.
Appeals & court records
Every appellate and trial record that names the person.
Complaints & discipline
Formal complaint and discipline records for judges, attorneys and court staff.
Attorney General & state oversight
AG investigations and reports, Comptroller audits, and ethics-commission filings.
Nonprofit, employment & personal matters
Board or employment separations, charity governance, and lawsuits the person is a party to.
Press & public record trail
Contemporaneous reporting, which often dates events the official record only implies.
Department territory: AD1 — 2 counties · AD2 — 10 counties · AD3 — 27 counties · AD4 — 22 counties
Pattern analysis
Themes are counted by distinct cases, not by review count, and are never treated as proof of misconduct.
No recurring theme reaches the reporting threshold
Public feedback
Each review shows its own verification level. A verified reviewer is not a verified allegation.
No published feedback yet
Right to respond
Judges and attorneys may publish a response. Responses are never edited for content and are never rated.
No response published
Contribute
A verified account is required
Feedback is only accepted from a verified reviewer: sign in with Google, or register by email and confirm your address. Your identity is never shown publicly.
Sign in to give feedbackOfficial information
Official record
Contact email · Sign in & subscribe to see contact email
Attorney grievance information
Complaints about a New York attorney are filed with the Attorney Grievance Committee for the judicial department where the attorney practices. Only that committee and the courts can impose discipline.
Full oversight directory in Civil Watchdog →Provenance
Every directory field carries its source, tier, retrieval date and verification date. Changes are kept, not overwritten.
No source records yet
Primary source: NYS Attorney Registrations (Office of Court Administration, NY Unified Court System) — data.ny.gov