New York attorney
Independent public-information platform. Not affiliated with the New York State Unified Court System.
Ratings and reviews reflect individual user experiences and are not findings of judicial misconduct, attorney misconduct, illegality, bias, corruption, or professional discipline. Official findings are displayed separately and linked to their authoritative source.
Public experience
Derived only from verified reviewer feedback, with the full formula published. This is not an official measure of performance.
Public experience
INSUFFICIENT VERIFIED FEEDBACK
0 verified reviews · 0 unique cases · 0 total submissions
Rating confidence
Insufficient
Early feedback — insufficient sample for a reliable public score (0 of 5 verified reviews).
No category ratings from verified reviewers yet
Trend
By case type
No case-type breakdown yet.
Separation of evidence
Public feedback, document-supported claims and official findings are counted separately and never merged into a single accusation number.
Claim ledger — never combined
Authoritative record
Only determinations by a court, appellate panel, grievance committee, judicial-conduct commission or comparable authority appear here.
No official finding of misconduct on record in this directory
Continuously monitored public record
Found automatically by name in public appellate, federal and disciplinary records and refreshed on a schedule. Documents are grouped into distinct cases by docket number. These are research leads, matched by name only — confirm each document before treating it as this person's case.
Anderson v. 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company
Crosby v. 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company
Wanda Purnell Davis and Jack Harold Davis
Moore v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
Stephen Harold Davis and Kerry Scott Brooks
Whaley v. The Village of Freeport
Jameson Harold Davis and Irene Cortez-Davis
Davis v. Fort Wayne Allergy & Asthma Consultants, Inc.
Manuel Diaz v. 3M Company
Wind-Down Bottle and Packaging, Inc.
McKenna v. Riley
United States v. $2,867.13 in funds from Ally Bank account ending in 3522
United States v. $2,867.13 in funds from Ally Bank account ending in 3522
Harold Davis and Colleen Davis
Steward Health Care System LLC
Kasper v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
Davis v. Hirt's LLC
New York Life Insurance and Annuity Corporation v. Davis
Reese Harold Davis and Chasity Lea-Ann Davis
Raymond Harold Davis, Jr.
In re the Claim of Davis
“ Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 15, 2009, which dismissed claimant’s appeal from a decision of an Administrative Law Judge as untimely. *1370By decision filed January 14, 2009, an Administrative Law Judge sustained the Commissioner of Labor’s initial determination that clai”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsHarris v. State
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Prudenti, PJ. This appeal requires us to determine whether a claim seeking damages from the State of New York for unjust conviction and imprisonment satisfied the pleading requirements of, and stated a cause of action under, Court of Claims Act § 8-b, and if so, whether the claimant was entitled t”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsDavis v. Branford Estates, Ltd.
“ 2 N.Y.3d 816 (2004) HAROLD DAVIS, Appellant, v. BRANFORD ESTATES, LTD., et al., Respondents. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Decided June 8, 2004. Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & DeCicco, New York City (Brian J. Isaac of counsel), for appellant. Thomas M. Bona, P.C., White Plains (Stephanie K. Cervoni of counsel)”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsDavis v. Branford Estates, Ltd.
“ —In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Branford Estates, Ltd., Leonard of Delaware, Limited Partnership, and 117-13 Union Turnpike Corp., individually and doing business under the name of Leonard Worth Associates, LLC, appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schneier, J”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsDavis v. Branford Estates, Ltd.
“ —In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, Leonard Worth Associates appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schneier, J.), dated August 16, 2001, as denied that branch of the motion of the defendants Branford Estates, Ltd., and Leonard of Delaware Lim”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsGoldberg v. Sitomer
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Samuel J. Silverman at the Appellate Division (97 AD2d 114). Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Simons and Kaye. Judge Meyer concurs on constraint of Morrison v National Broadcasting Co. (19 NY2d 453”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsGoldberg v. Sitomer, Sitomer & Porges
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Silverman, J. These are appeals from orders of the Supreme Court, Special Term, denying defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaint on the grounds of Statute of Limitations and failure to state a cause of action. Plaintiff, a lawyer, alleges that he was employed as an associate by the law firm of”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsAndrias v. National Surety Corp.
“ OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. Order entered June 8, 1978 (L. Cohen, J.), affirmed with $10 costs for the reasons stated by L. Cohen, J., at Special Term. We agree with Special Term that the United States District Court, in its order of May 11, 1976 concluded that the subject attachment was improper. Beyond the ab”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsDavis v. Sprain Construction Co.
“ — Motion for reargument is granted and, upon reargument, the original memorandum is withdrawn and the following memorandum is published: Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered June 13, 1975, granting plaintiffs motion to increase the ad damnum from $60,000 to $500,000, unanimously reversed, on the law and in the ”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsDavis v. Sprain Construction Co.
“ Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered June 13,1975, granting plaintiff’s motion to increase the ad damnum from $60,000 to $500,000, unanimously reversed, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, and the motion denied, without costs or disbursements. Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered June 17, 1975,”
CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinionsPublic web mentions
Negative results found on the public web by automated search. These are unverified mentions from third-party sites — not official records, not allegations by this directory, and not findings of fact. Each entry links to the original page so you can read it in context.
No negative web results located yet — this profile is queued for the next automated sweep
Evidence submitted on this platform
Documents and case facts submitted through the case-analysis and investigation tools and attached permanently to Harold Davis. Each entry is an allegation by the person who submitted it, published with its origin and evidence level — not a finding of fact by this directory.
No case-analysis evidence attached to this profile yet
Sign in to attach evidence from a case you analysed. A case number is required.
Court calendars
Appearance dates for this name across the New York courts, taken from published court calendars and public argument records. Anyone can read this section.
Court calendars — public listings
Calendar entries are public court listings located by name match and kept with their official source link. Court calendars change daily and names repeat — confirm every date on the court's own calendar before relying on it. A listing is not an allegation and not a finding about anyone.
Reading the published court calendars…
No future date for this name has appeared on a published calendar yet. The collector re-checks every court calendar automatically — use the official calendar search routes below in the meantime.
Appearance search (all ten courts)
Supreme and County Court civil appearances, calendars by justice, attorney and index number.
Criminal Court and County Court criminal appearance dates and parts.
Local civil courts, including NYC Civil Court appearance calendars.
Filed documents and scheduled conference dates in e-filed cases.
Court calendars & parts
Daily calendars published by the Unified Court System.
Court addresses, parts, clerks and published part rules.
Family and Surrogate's Court terms, parts and public calendar notices.
Claims against the State: calendars, decisions and judge assignments.
Appellate calendars
Arguments before the state's highest court.
AD1 argument and motion calendars.
AD2 argument and motion calendars.
AD3 argument calendars.
AD4 argument calendars.
Appellate Term calendars for the lower courts.
Recorded and scheduled oral arguments in public court records.
Court record research
Search public appellate decisions and federal dockets that name this person — judge, attorney or court clerk. Name matches are research leads, never findings.
Name-match research — not a finding
These are appeals and federal filings located by public name search. A person's name appearing in a case does not mean they were accused of anything, and names repeat — always open the docket before drawing any conclusion.
Appeals of orders
Federal filings
Oversight determinations
Comparative research
Pick a procedural pattern and compare how each Appellate Division department handled it. These are published decisions located by text search — comparisons, not findings about any person.
Best-interest findings, attorney for the child, Lincoln hearings, custody or neglect appeals.
Appellate Division, First Department
New York, Bronx
Appellate Division, Second Department
Kings, Queens, Richmond, Nassau, Suffolk, Westchester, Rockland, Orange, Putnam, Dutchess
Appellate Division, Third Department
Albany, Broome, Chemung, Clinton, Columbia, Cortland, Delaware, Essex, Franklin, Fulton, Greene, Hamilton, Madison, Montgomery, Otsego, Rensselaer, St. Lawrence, Saratoga, Schenectady, Schoharie, Schuyler, Sullivan, Tioga, Tompkins, Ulster, Warren, Washington
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Erie, Monroe, Onondaga, Oneida, Niagara, Allegany, Cattaraugus, Cayuga, Chautauqua, Genesee, Herkimer, Jefferson, Lewis, Livingston, Ontario, Orleans, Oswego, Seneca, Steuben, Wayne, Wyoming, Yates
Full public footprint — Harold Davis
Every appeal, complaint, oversight report, nonprofit filing, personal lawsuit and press mention that public sources expose for this name. Name-match only: confirm the identity in the source before treating any item as this person's record, and never treat an allegation or investigation as a finding.
Appeals & court records
Every appellate and trial record that names the person.
Complaints & discipline
Formal complaint and discipline records for judges, attorneys and court staff.
Attorney General & state oversight
AG investigations and reports, Comptroller audits, and ethics-commission filings.
Nonprofit, employment & personal matters
Board or employment separations, charity governance, and lawsuits the person is a party to.
Press & public record trail
Contemporaneous reporting, which often dates events the official record only implies.
Department territory: AD1 — 2 counties · AD2 — 10 counties · AD3 — 27 counties · AD4 — 22 counties
Pattern analysis
Themes are counted by distinct cases, not by review count, and are never treated as proof of misconduct.
No recurring theme reaches the reporting threshold
Public feedback
Each review shows its own verification level. A verified reviewer is not a verified allegation.
No published feedback yet
Right to respond
Judges and attorneys may publish a response. Responses are never edited for content and are never rated.
No response published
Contribute
A verified account is required
Feedback is only accepted from a verified reviewer: sign in with Google, or register by email and confirm your address. Your identity is never shown publicly.
Sign in to give feedbackOfficial information
Official record
Contact email · Sign in & subscribe to see contact email
Attorney grievance information
Complaints about a New York attorney are filed with the Attorney Grievance Committee for the judicial department where the attorney practices. Only that committee and the courts can impose discipline.
Full oversight directory in Civil Watchdog →Provenance
Every directory field carries its source, tier, retrieval date and verification date. Changes are kept, not overwritten.
No source records yet
Primary source: NYS Attorney Registrations (Office of Court Administration, NY Unified Court System) — data.ny.gov