← NY Justice Ledger directory

Edward J. Murphy

New York attorney

Registration: DeceasedReg. 1000256Second DeptVerified 8/25/2026
Open full investigation dossier →

Independent public-information platform. Not affiliated with the New York State Unified Court System.

Ratings and reviews reflect individual user experiences and are not findings of judicial misconduct, attorney misconduct, illegality, bias, corruption, or professional discipline. Official findings are displayed separately and linked to their authoritative source.

Public experience

Experience score and confidence

Derived only from verified reviewer feedback, with the full formula published. This is not an official measure of performance.

Public experience

INSUFFICIENT VERIFIED FEEDBACK

0 verified reviews · 0 unique cases · 0 total submissions

Rating confidence

Insufficient

Early feedback — insufficient sample for a reliable public score (0 of 5 verified reviews).

No category ratings from verified reviewers yet

Trend

  • Last 12 monthsn=0 — insufficient
  • Prior 12 monthsn=0 — insufficient

By case type

No case-type breakdown yet.

How this rating is calculated
  • Only published reviews from verified reviewers count toward the score.
  • Each review is weighted by verification: verified person ×0.5, verified case participant ×1, document-supported ×1.5, official-record-confirmed ×2. Unverified (level 0) reviews are weighted ×0 and never move the score.
  • Each category is the weighted mean of 1–5 answers, rescaled to 0–100 as (mean − 1) ÷ 4 × 100.
  • The overall score is the unweighted mean of the category scores that received at least one answer.
  • Reviews flagged by the review-integrity engine as possible coordinated activity are excluded from the score and reported separately.
  • No overall score is published below 5 verified reviews.
  • Confidence reflects verified review count, number of distinct cases, recency and verification strength — never the sentiment of the reviews.

Separation of evidence

Claim ledger

Public feedback, document-supported claims and official findings are counted separately and never merged into a single accusation number.

Claim ledger — never combined

  • Public feedback allegationsTier 5 — reviewer statements only0
  • Document-supportedSupported by a filing, order or transcript0
  • Official findingsDetermined by an authoritative body0

Authoritative record

Official findings

Only determinations by a court, appellate panel, grievance committee, judicial-conduct commission or comparable authority appear here.

No official finding of misconduct on record in this directory

Continuously monitored public record

Located public documents — 30 distinct cases (30 documents)

Found automatically by name in public appellate, federal and disciplinary records and refreshed on a schedule. Documents are grouped into distinct cases by docket number. These are research leads, matched by name only — confirm each document before treating it as this person's case.

  • Case1:25-cv-04400District Court, District of Columbia2025-12-18Name match · confidence 901 document

    OREGON ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE

  • Case2:25-cv-13458District Court, D. South Carolina2025-11-19Name match · confidence 901 document

    Miller II v. 3M Company

  • Case7:25-cv-08507District Court, S.D. New York2025-10-13Name match · confidence 901 document

    Anderson v. County of Westchester

  • Case2:25-cv-12484District Court, D. South Carolina2025-09-10Name match · confidence 901 document

    Grenz v. 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co.

  • Case1:25-cv-00225District Court, N.D. New York2025-02-19Name match · confidence 901 document

    Boyd v. United States Government

  • Case2:24-cv-07744District Court, E.D. New York2024-11-06Name match · confidence 901 document

    Blouin v. Bay Point Capital Partners II, L.P.

  • Case8:24-cv-02284District Court, C.D. California2024-10-21Name match · confidence 901 document

    Edward Murphy v. Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company

  • Case8-24-73482United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York2024-09-09Name match · confidence 901 document

    Edward J Murphy

  • Case24-30471Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit2024-07-29Name match · confidence 901 document

    Currault v. American River Trans

  • Case1:23-cv-11195District Court, S.D. New York2023-12-27Name match · confidence 901 document

    The New York Times Company v. Microsoft Corporation

  • Case2:23-cv-04884District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania2023-12-11Name match · confidence 901 document

    OGILVIE v. SUMMA GLOBAL EDUCATION

  • Case23-2661Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit2023-08-22Name match · confidence 901 document

    George Mano v. Janet Yellen

  • Case8-23-72834United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York2023-08-02Name match · confidence 901 document

    Aberdeen Enterprises, Inc.

  • Case23-1565Court of Appeals for the First Circuit2023-07-18Name match · confidence 901 document

    Harper v. Werfel

  • Case2:23-cv-11719District Court, E.D. Michigan2023-07-18Name match · confidence 901 document

    Schoolcraft Community College District v. United States

  • Case2:23-cv-02575District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania2023-07-06Name match · confidence 901 document

    TSCHOEPE v. MALVERN HEALTH, INC.

  • Case1:23-cv-00494District Court, W.D. Michigan2023-05-12Name match · confidence 901 document

    Buchanan v. Wuis

  • Case4:23-cv-00287District Court, N.D. Alabama2023-03-09Name match · confidence 901 document

    Agro Holdings LLC v. United States of America

  • Case2:22-cv-04891District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania2022-12-08Name match · confidence 901 document

    WEAVER v. MASTERY CHARTER SCHOOLS

  • Case2:22-cv-07190District Court, E.D. New York2022-11-28Name match · confidence 901 document

    Aberdeen Enterprises, Inc. v. United States

  • CaseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York2000-03-27Name match · confidence 801 document

    In re the Estate of Murphy

    “ —Appeal by the objectant from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County (Feinberg, S.), dated June 17, 1999. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs payable by the appellant personally, for reasons stated by Surrogate Feinberg at the Surrogate’s Court. Santucci, J. P., Joy, Goldstein and Schmidt, JJ., con”

    CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinions
  • CaseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York1997-01-27Name match · confidence 801 document

    People v. Murphy

    “ In a proceeding pursuant to “Executive Law § 63-c to recover public funds, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Rohl, J.), dated August 23, 1995, which, inter alia, dismissed the proceeding. Ordered that the judgment is modified by deleting the provision thereof which dismissed ”

    CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinions
  • CaseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York1970-06-09Name match · confidence 801 document

    Warner v. New York Central Railroad

    “ McNally, J. Plaintiff has had a recovery under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (U. S. Code, tit. 45, § 51 et seq.) for personal injuries in the sum of $35,200. In our opinion, the plaintiff’s presence on the premises was not a necessary incident to the discharge of the duties of his employment. This ease has been”

    CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinions
  • CaseNew York Court of Appeals1960-11-17Name match · confidence 801 document

    Polk v. New York Central Railroad

    “ Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion. Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster. ”

    CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinions
  • CaseAppeal No. 1Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York1937-11-05Name match · confidence 901 document

    Murphy v. Incorporated Village of Farmingdale

    “ Carswell, J. Plaintiff suffered personal injuries as a consequence of an automobile, which he was operating after dark, colliding with a concrete base on which was set a stanchion to support a traffic control signal or tower maintained by the defendant village at the intersection of two of its streets. His complaint a”

    CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinions
  • CaseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York1935-06-15Name match · confidence 801 document

    Cloe v. Murphy

    “ The complaint alleges that the defendant leased to plaintiff to work on shares a farm with certain stock and tools for the term of one year beginning on March 1, 1928, and that on December 1,1928, the parties entered into a further agreement renewing the original lease with certain changes for the term of one year beg”

    CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinions
  • CaseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York1934-01-15Name match · confidence 801 document

    Cloe v. Murphy

    “ Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ. [148 Misc. 819.] ”

    CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinions
  • CaseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York1914-03-15Name match · confidence 801 document

    John L. Schwartz Brewing Co. v. Murphy

    “ Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs. ”

    CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinions
  • CaseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York1913-11-15Name match · confidence 801 document

    Murphy v. Long Island Electric Railway Co.

    “ Order reversed, with costs, and verdict unanimously reinstated, with costs. (See Simonsen v. Brooklyn Heights R. R. Co., 53 App. Div. 478.) Present—Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ. ”

    CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinions
  • CaseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York1902-07-01Name match · confidence 801 document

    Crane v. Bennett

    “ Patterson, J.: In an action brought to recover damages for alleged libels published concerning the plaintiff, in the defendant’s newspaper, the jury rendered a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $40,000. The defendant appeals from the judgment entered upon that verdict and from an order denying a motion for a new”

    CourtListener — NY Appellate Division & Court of Appeals opinions

Public web mentions

Public complaints, news & mentions (0)

Negative results found on the public web by automated search. These are unverified mentions from third-party sites — not official records, not allegations by this directory, and not findings of fact. Each entry links to the original page so you can read it in context.

0 news articles0 complaint / review pages0 other mentions
Avvo: 0Ripoff Report: 0Yelp: 0BBB: 0Reddit: 0

No negative web results located yet — this profile is queued for the next automated sweep

    Evidence submitted on this platform

    Case-analysis exhibits (0)

    Documents and case facts submitted through the case-analysis and investigation tools and attached permanently to Edward J. Murphy. Each entry is an allegation by the person who submitted it, published with its origin and evidence level — not a finding of fact by this directory.

    No case-analysis evidence attached to this profile yet

    Sign in to attach evidence from a case you analysed. A case number is required.

    Court calendars

    Court dates on the public calendars

    Appearance dates for this name across the New York courts, taken from published court calendars and public argument records. Anyone can read this section.

    Court calendars — public listings

    Calendar entries are public court listings located by name match and kept with their official source link. Court calendars change daily and names repeat — confirm every date on the court's own calendar before relying on it. A listing is not an allegation and not a finding about anyone.

    Reading the published court calendars…

    Next listed dates (0)

    No future date for this name has appeared on a published calendar yet. The collector re-checks every court calendar automatically — use the official calendar search routes below in the meantime.

    Appearance search (all ten courts)

    Court calendars & parts

    Appellate calendars

    Court record research

    Appeals of orders & federal cases

    Search public appellate decisions and federal dockets that name this person — judge, attorney or court clerk. Name matches are research leads, never findings.

    Name-match research — not a finding

    These are appeals and federal filings located by public name search. A person's name appearing in a case does not mean they were accused of anything, and names repeat — always open the docket before drawing any conclusion.

    Comparative research

    Similar cases across AD1 · AD2 · AD3 · AD4

    Pick a procedural pattern and compare how each Appellate Division department handled it. These are published decisions located by text search — comparisons, not findings about any person.

    Best-interest findings, attorney for the child, Lincoln hearings, custody or neglect appeals.

    Departments

    Appellate Division, Second Department

    Kings, Queens, Richmond, Nassau, Suffolk, Westchester, Rockland, Orange, Putnam, Dutchess

    Appellate Division, Third Department

    Albany, Broome, Chemung, Clinton, Columbia, Cortland, Delaware, Essex, Franklin, Fulton, Greene, Hamilton, Madison, Montgomery, Otsego, Rensselaer, St. Lawrence, Saratoga, Schenectady, Schoharie, Schuyler, Sullivan, Tioga, Tompkins, Ulster, Warren, Washington

    Appellate Division, Fourth Department

    Erie, Monroe, Onondaga, Oneida, Niagara, Allegany, Cattaraugus, Cayuga, Chautauqua, Genesee, Herkimer, Jefferson, Lewis, Livingston, Ontario, Orleans, Oswego, Seneca, Steuben, Wayne, Wyoming, Yates

    Full public footprint — Edward J. Murphy

    Every appeal, complaint, oversight report, nonprofit filing, personal lawsuit and press mention that public sources expose for this name. Name-match only: confirm the identity in the source before treating any item as this person's record, and never treat an allegation or investigation as a finding.

    Press & public record trail

    Contemporaneous reporting, which often dates events the official record only implies.

    Department territory: AD1 — 2 counties · AD2 — 10 counties · AD3 — 27 counties · AD4 — 22 counties

    Pattern analysis

    Recurring themes in public feedback

    Themes are counted by distinct cases, not by review count, and are never treated as proof of misconduct.

    No recurring theme reaches the reporting threshold

    Public feedback

    Published reviews (0)

    Each review shows its own verification level. A verified reviewer is not a verified allegation.

    No published feedback yet

    Right to respond

    Response from this profile

    Judges and attorneys may publish a response. Responses are never edited for content and are never rated.

    No response published

    Contribute

    Add your experience

    A verified account is required

    Feedback is only accepted from a verified reviewer: sign in with Google, or register by email and confirm your address. Your identity is never shown publicly.

    Sign in to give feedback
    Sign in to submit feedback

    Official information

    Public contact information

    Attorney grievance information

    Complaints about a New York attorney are filed with the Attorney Grievance Committee for the judicial department where the attorney practices. Only that committee and the courts can impose discipline.

    Full oversight directory in Civil Watchdog →

    Provenance

    Where each field came from

    Every directory field carries its source, tier, retrieval date and verification date. Changes are kept, not overwritten.

    No source records yet

    Primary source: NYS Attorney Registrations (Office of Court Administration, NY Unified Court System) — data.ny.gov